Last Sunday I had a moment for to take some pictures that I had in my mental folder where I store the next sets I want to shoot, waiting for the right season, the weather, the tide, the moon, the colour of leaves, etc, as every Photographer does.
so I brought in the middle of a Mangrove swamp two cameras of mine, the D300 Nikon with my everyday lens, the 18-70 mm a 3.5 lens, that cover the 90% of my needs, and the Mamiya RZ67 PRO II with the 65mm f/4 lens, that is, approximately, as a35 mm lens in the 35mm world.
I set the D300 the on monochrome with green filter, and I placed a green filter on the Mamiya, for to have a similar condition of gradation of grays.
the D300 was set to a 1EV less than 200ISO, the lowest ISO possible on this camera, while in the Mamiya back I load an Ilford Pan F 50 ISO, a great film for to record details, with a great range of grays.
Once I placed the tripod in a location where I could take pictures of a nice composition of trees, mangrove roots, leaves in the sun , that, thanks to the green filter looks almost white, dark mud and very dark spots of shadows, I shoot several times with both cameras and, the two ” versions” of the same view are the ones that you can see here

This is the Mamiya Picture, took with the 65m F/4 lens and the green Filter 1x, more or less a 35 mm in the 35mm film camera world

This is the Nikos D300 picture, took with he 18-70mm F/3.5 at 18mm, more or less a 24 mm in 35mm film camera
What we have here is a very similar situation, in term of general ” feeling, and some difference of levels and curves are, possibly due to some different setting during the “digitalization” of the film, Scanned with an Epson V500 Photo, and processed with Lightroom.
But we can appreciate a slight difference of prospective, everything in the Nikon capture is ” compressed ” for to make possible to fit the image in the small sensor of the DX format, while the Mamiya, with a 60mm x 70mm film surface, doesn’t need to compress anything, and the image is much more similar to the real one.
But the big difference amongst these two Photographic formats is appreciable when we go to see the images at the 100%

This is a detail of the Nikon Picture enlarged at the 100 %, great details of everything, even the small elements in the deep shadow

This the Mamiya Picture, great definition of the front leaves, but some blur on the leaves in the back, and lost of details in the shadow, but, again, here we are observing a reproduction of a film, scanned in ” dry ” method, that doesn’t really offers the best possibilities of transfer all the details to the digital media.
But, you know, here, we are observing a crop at only 35 % !!
the size of this pictures, scanned at 3200 DPI, is, at 100 % of more than 3 metres of height, against the ” small ” one metre and something of the Digital one.
So, what do we have to do? Shoot with Digital or Film?
At these levels, the answer, for me, is : it doesn’t matter.
I like to shoot with the Digital Cameras, for the easy is to check the work i am doing and for the amount of picture I can store in one of my pockets, but wen I want feel the emotion of to take a “Photo ” , I can’t avoid to take my heavy, anti ergonomic, complicated Medium Format Mamiya , insert one of that rolls of just 10 captures and wait for to hear that ” ploft ” of the mirror.
Comments are welcome.